Axiom 3 (Local Commutativity), curved spacetime #
This file formalises the blueprint declaration
def:local-commutativity-in-curved-spacetime (Axiom 3 of the
Haag-Kastler axioms on a Lorentzian spacetime, Chapter 10
(sections/sec10/haag-kastler-axioms-in-curved-spacetime) of the
AQFT-in-Lean blueprint):
Let
๐โ,๐โbe Alexandrov-basis sets. If๐โand๐โare completely spacelike, then for any basis element๐with๐โ, ๐โ โ ๐the algebras๐(๐โ)and๐(๐โ)commute inside๐(๐), i.e.i(aโ) i(aโ) - i(aโ) i(aโ) = 0, whereiis the isotony*-monomorphism (Axiom 2). If no such๐exists, no condition is imposed.
Main definitions #
Physicslib4.AQFT.HaagKastlerCurved.LocalCommutativity: aProp-valued predicate on aLocalNet Masserting Axiom 3.
Modelling notes #
This is the point where the curved axioms genuinely diverge from the Minkowski ones: there is no global quasilocal algebra on a generic Lorentzian spacetime, so commutativity cannot be phrased inside one ambient C*-algebra. Instead we quantify over a common containing basis set
B(when one exists) and assert commutativity inside the local algebra๐(B), transported there by the isotony embeddingsi : ๐(Bแตข) โช ๐(B).The isotony embeddings used are exactly those of Axiom 2: the predicate takes the
Isotonyfamily as a parameter and requires the images of its embeddings to commute; it introduces no family of its own. When no common containing basis setBexists, the universally quantified condition is vacuously satisfied, matching the blueprint's "if no such๐exists, it doesn't make sense to ask whether they commute".
Axiom 3 in curved spacetime (local commutativity): observables of completely spacelike basis sets commute in every basis set containing both.
Let Bโ and Bโ be completely spacelike basis sets. To multiply an element of ๐(Bโ) by one of ๐(Bโ), both must lie in one algebra. As in Minkowski spacetime, the axiom takes any basis set B containing both, and asks that for all aโ โ ๐(Bโ) and aโ โ ๐(Bโ) the equation
i(Bโ, B)(aโ) i(Bโ, B)(aโ) = i(Bโ, B)(aโ) i(Bโ, B)(aโ)
holds in ๐(B), where i is the isotony family of Axiom 2. The difference from Minkowski spacetime is that such a B need not exist, and there is no quasilocal algebra to fall back on. When no common containing basis set exists the condition is vacuous: the two algebras do not lie in a common algebra, so their commutation is not a meaningful question.
The axiom asserts only the commutation. The embeddings, their injectivity and their identity and composition laws belong to Axiom 2, whose family is a parameter here, so results that factor a three-fold inclusion Bโ โ Bโ โ B need no separate coherence hypothesis.
Blueprint: def:local-commutativity-in-curved-spacetime
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.